Just Shut Up and Pay
GRAVITAS . . . . Fair and Brutal Opinion (Trapped by Facts)
About Contributing Journalist Scott J. Graves in his own words
Scott J. Graves, Esq., B.S. Biology, M.S. Pharmacology, J.D. Law – Father, Born-and-Bred Gardnerien-American, Gardner Native of Acadien Heritage, Gardner High School Class of 1982, Gardner Citizen-Voter, Gardner Homeowner/Taxpayer, 30-year Gardner Business Owner, 30-year Gardner Lawyer, former 16-year Gardner City Councillor, former Gardner City Council President, and former Gardner City Solicitor and Head of the City of Gardner Law Department.
Leave us your news tip
The Gardner City Council held its regular Meeting on Tuesday, February 22, 2022.
At that City Council Meeting, the City Council voted to spend more money to crush and stamp out former Councillor Scott Joseph Graves’ Public Records Law appeal pending in Worcester Superior Court.
You all have access to that case on https://www.masscourts.org/eservices/home.page.2
When you get in the “search” field, type in “City of Gardner” or you can just type in the case number: 2185CV00791.
This City Council voting to waste your money is not surprising.
But, what did shock and stun the City Hall Ruling Class was the close 6-4 vote. The Ruling Class has come to expect the usual 11-0 or 10-1 vote.
The six Councillors responsible for wasting your money were led by Councillor James Walsh – who explained that the City Council simply had no choice. That was, of course, not explained. Walsh was asked to explain, and he couldn’t do it. There is no valid explanation for this waste of money apart from city politics and Ruling Class hegemony.
Walsh got the usual Ruling Class sheep (Kazinskas, Dernalowicz, Tyros, and The Cormiers) to vote the way the Ruling Class expects them to vote, the way they always vote (collectively – automatically – incuriously).
Are we being too harsh? Sheep? Is the image of a flock of sheep, grazing non-stop without looking up while being led mindlessly wherever their handlers take them, overly simplified?
You tell us. Go back and read the City Council Minutes for yourself. Go back to, oh I don’t know, Jan. 6, 2020 – and read them all the way to 2/22/22. For some of them, go back further – and see how they vote. Count the City Council votes where any of those 6 voted differently than any of the others. You tell us if we are exaggerating. It’s all there. http://ma-gardner.civicplus.com/DocumentCenter
Did we mention that 6 votes is a majority, and will always (with rare exceptions) carry the vote?
The four Councillors watching out for your money were Councillors Boone, Boudreau, Hardern, and Heath. They are acting the way they should. They acted as if they were writing the checks out from their own checkbooks. It’s called fiscal responsibility. Thank you.
The 6-4 to spend this money means the City Council has already spent $20,000 on outside lawyers on this case. Outside lawyers.
But, wait. What? Don’t we, the Citizens, already pay two lawyers $125,000 per year to handle “all” cases for the City? Answer: yes, we do. Read City Ordinance, Chapter 140-2. https://ecode360.com/15385287
Our City law (Ordinance Chapter 140) says that Flick & Kolodny, in return for their automatic paychecks that we the Citizens pay them, must “handle all legal affairs pertaining to the City.” “All.”
So, why aren’t they?
Gardner Government Watch has asked. It’s a secret.
In fact, it is so super secret that the City Council, without any legal authority under the Open Meeting Law to do so, met in secret to discuss it – behind the Citizens’ backs (in “Executive Session”). There is a pending Open Meeting Law complaint we filed, which is now pending.
This secret, which no one in the Ruling Class will explain, is why Councillor Boone (backed by Councillors Boudreau, Hardern, and Heath) wanted Flick & Kolodny to stand before the Citizens and explain why.
But, Walsh convinced his fellow mono-thinkers (Kazinskas, Dernalowicz, Tyros, and the Cormiers) to shoot that down. No – Flick & Kolodny can’t be asked to bow down to the lowly Citizens like that. How dare you question them? Shut up, and pay.
So, what’s this Graves’ Public Records Request case in Superior Court all about?
Graves is trying to get public records having to do with the Coil Scandal, and the condition of the City’s drinking water.
You know, the Coil Scandal – the one where the City’s drinking water, for decades, caused your home heating coils to corrode before your eyes, one after the other. You know – the one that cost us, the Citizen homeowners, many tens of thousands of dollars to replace our coils (several times).
We, the City homeowners, are all still standing around with our pockets turned inside out – and zero information about why. So, Graves, your former City Councillor, tried to get information for you. No one else will, and no one else even tried.
As we speak, the City and the State (each with unlimited supplies of Taxpayer money and resources) are doing everything they can to crush Graves’ case, and make it all go away – so that the Citizens can remain in the dark about the Coil Scandal.
Are any of us, the Gardner homeowners, going to get reimbursed for all the money we lost?
Shut up, and pay.
Don’t we have City insurance to get compensation for the City Homeowners who got shafted?
Yes – but, the City’s insurance company denied the claims.
Can our insurance company do that?
Well, once again, City Councillor Graves submitted a public records request – asking for the insurance company’s denial letter. John Flick, the Mayor’s lawyer/consiglieri, said insurance company denial letters are “confidential” if there is pending litigation. That “pending litigation” is the infamous Magliancane v. City of Gardner case (which concerns the Coil Scandal). So, he denied Councillor Graves’ request.
Here is how crazy the Coil Scandal makes them. Shortly after that, the Mayor voluntarily disclosed a different insurance denial letter to the Public – no one even asked for it. That other insurance denial letter had to do with Graves’ pending Public Records Law appeal in Superior Court (Graves v. City of Gardner).
So, both insurance denial letters have to do with pending litigation – and both have to do with the Coil Scandal. One denial letter was concealed by the Mayor and Flick from an elected City Councillor (and the Citizens) because of “pending litigation,” and the other one was released voluntarily by the Mayor and Flick to the entire world via the internet – even though it is subject to “pending litigation” having to do with the same Coil Scandal.
When it is in the Ruling Class’s interest to divulge confidential information to the Citizens, the Ruling Class releases it. When it isn’t in their interest, they don’t. This is your City government, at its best.
Anyway, why is the City wasting your money to pay outside lawyers? To conceal information from you, and keep you in the dark, about the Coil Scandal.
Mayor Nicholson has told you that this is going to cost you, the Taxpayers, at least $82,075 – all for the purpose of keeping you ignorant.
Back to the 2/22/22 City Council Meeting. The City Council’s new financial/litigation expert, Attorney Alek Dernalowicz, told the People not to worry – the Brinks Truck has finally arrived, he said.
Dernalowicz explained that the State has finally joined the fight against Graves. Dernalowicz said that this mean that the State, quote, “will be part of bearing the costs going forward as well.”
You can watch the YouTube video, if you dare. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tTXLNRJCUyw
But, we’ll take the liberty of translating Attorney Dernalowicz’ gibberish into something coherent. What he said means: don’t worry Gardner Taxpayers, the State has finally showed up, and is going to share in the payment of your attorney’s fees from now on.
That’s false. First of all, the State has been in this case since the beginning. So, if the State was going to pay the Gardner Citizens’ outside attorney’s fees in this case, the State would already have been doing this all along for the last several months (about 8 months). The State, as you can well imagine if you have a brain, has not been doing that – it can’t do that.
Dernalowicz was dissembling (otherwise, he’s confused). There are no legal “costs” for the City in this case. Dernalowicz and his fellow spendthrifts on the City Council are wasting your money on “attorney’s fees” for outside lawyers – not on “costs.”
But, they can’t come out and say “attorney’s fees.” That would make John Flick look bad – because you, the Citizens, already pay the two full-time City lawyers (the Gardner Law Department), Flick & Kolodny, $125,000 a year in automatic paychecks for “attorney’s fees.”
This $125,000 that you, the Citizens, pay Flick & Kolodny are not “costs.” These are “attorney’s fees.” Every year when our city government passes the City Budget, the Citizens agree to pay Flick & Kolodny $125,000 per year (plus benefits) for their “attorney’s fees.”
Why do we agree to do this? So that we, the Citizens, do not have to pay outside lawyers for attorney’s fees.
But, here we are – paying tens of thousands of dollars in additional attorney’s fees (for no valid reason) to outside lawyers – while our two full-time, and highly-paid, lawyers are sitting on the bench in this case and cashing their automatic City paychecks over at Flick’s private business known as “Flick Law Group, P.C.” at 144 Central Street. https://www.flicklawgroup.com/
Meanwhile, fellow Ruling Class members, Dernalowicz and Walsh and the other 4 Ruling Class sheep, tell you: shut up and pay.
Anyway, in the United States, every party in a lawsuit pays their own “attorney’s fees.” This case is no different. The State (which in Dernalowicz’s fairy tale is the knight-in-shining-armor rolling in on a Brinks Truck) will not pay the Gardner Citizens’ “attorney’s fees.”
In fact, even if the State wanted to, that would be, well, illegal.
No one, certainly not Beacon Hill, is going to “share” your financial burden. Don’t believe us – just do your own Public Records Request. Get the attorney’s fees bills in this case, and do the math. firstname.lastname@example.org
This is City of Gardner Taxpayer money wasted because our Law Department decided to put themselves on the bench. The Mayor and the City Council and the Law Department are all good with that. You, the Citizen, might say the bench is a good place for them.
But, the price of Flick & Kolondy sitting on the bench, these additional tens of thousands of dollars in attorney’s fees, is being paid by checks written on the backs of the Gardner Citizens.
Bend over, shut up, and pay.
You are doing all this for City Hall’s generosity of paying for outside lawyers to keep you, the Citizens, from finding out any information related to the Coil Scandal. That is, to keep you ignorant.
Like the brave Councillor James Boone said at that City Council Meeting, here we all are, we Citizens, after decades of getting our pockets picked in this Coil Scandal, and we, the Citizens, have not received one penny of compensation, or one shred of information. Zeros, all around. Empty pockets, ignorance, sounds bad. Feels like losing.
What’s going on? Shut up, and pay.
Councillor Boone was wrong about one thing. He said that the cause of your ruined (corroded) copper coils is “questionably” the condition of the City’s drinking water. This is not “questionable.”
No one disputes that the destruction of your heating coils was caused by the condition of the City’s drinking water – which we are all forced to buy from the City. That is not debatable.
The bottom line is this: we, the Citizens, are shelling out tens of thousands of dollars for some expensive outside law firm to keep us ignorant – when we are already paying $125,000 a year to two full-time City lawyers on our payroll who are already doing that all by themselves.
This is like paying the exterminator good money to release mice into your house which is already infested because the cat is friends with the mice.
Shut up, and pay.
John Flick, of Flick Law Group, P.C. (and Gardner City Solicitor)
Ethan Kolodny, of Flick Law Group, P.C. (and Assistant City Solicitor)
Above, we made a public records request as city officials were no comment when we contacted.
Listen Now! A podcast on the latest Open Meeting Law Violation
Below, we’ve made a request for information regarding the week’s activities.
Also from M the Media Project
Mental Suppository Podcast
On the Rocks Politica
SMG’s ‘Are We Here Yet’?
Interested in advertising with us? Perhaps you want a unique way to support the economic development work we accomplish while getting access to our intelligent and informed listeners? Join our roster of supporters. Click that button below to find out more.