Making Plastic People
Used by permission of artist
Scott M. Graves is Founder of M the Media Project and SMGraves Associates. As contributing writer to M, he writes under the series Politics, Done Local and Democratic Capitalism in addition to Essays from An Artist.
He is Director of StartUp Rutland, a technology business incubator re-defining the economy for Rutland, VT which he and his family recently moved to. StartUp Rutland is housed in The Hub CoWorks.
His work at SMGraves Associates focuses on building value in real property by considering the commercial and social ecosystems that play out within our built environments. Community Development that seeks to build pride in place and create economic opportunity for more citizens of our cities and towns.
Our use of AI (Artificial Intelligence) may just epitomize the broke in our broken culture.
The use of AI to write one’s paper, to ‘create’ one’s art and to generally accelerate our capability to consume ‘content’ feeds what I feel may be the pinnacle of what’s ‘broke’.
Don’t get me wrong. I don’t believe it’s the tool that is the problem. I’m not Rev. Shaw Moore and this isn’t Bomont (great reference to Footloose, right?). I’m feeling more like Robert Owen, the 19th century industrialist who straddled the fence between the use of technologies for good and for ill when it came to his employees.
I’m the director of a business incubator that’s building a technology cluster to the benefit of a regional economic ecosystem. So to be ‘against tech’ would, in certain terms, be extremely counter-productive.
But shouldn’t we ask ourselves whether the hot new solution being presented is truly beneficial for society? Or rather, what is the best use given our developing understanding for the consequences?
Our use of artificial intelligence may miss the point. By 3000 miles.
For only in this broken culture can the singular priority be to present, to garner bragging rights, to ‘make it all look so cool’ on the outside.
We already have evidence that the plastic world we’re all devising for ourselves on social media platforms is making some of us anxious. We know groups within our communities are exhibiting widespread depression and other serious maladies attributed to our digital behaviors, think teenagers and the increased episodes of suicide or depression in their age bracket.
Creativity, the desire to build that which is yet to be formed, the comradery found in finding a group of people dedicated to the same mission as you; these are the ties that bind and remind us who we are and who we want to be.
I thought ‘the point’ was the process. The struggle. The feeling of risk, going for broke. Better than sex.
I don’t know about you but I don’t get the same effect from a data scraper bot hitting up thousands of struggling artists so it can ‘derive’ what at best can’t possibly be called art.
Where is Frank Zappa when we need him.
But for so many, the priority has become appearances. Appearances made more effective through the misuse of technology. For in my mind the use of tools like ChatGPT or the widespread scraping of artist original work (I say pilfering) by platforms such as Stable Diffusion is a misuse of technology. At the one there is copyright infringement. But I fear a much more pervasive, perhaps sinister aspect we’re not readily considering.
They took most of it all away from us. Now they’re taking the creative process away. and we’re giving it up so very willingly.
Can the widespread use of scraping tools and other forms of artificial intelligence that derive for you, used millions of times for days, weeks, months and years develop a tipping point where humans loose their desire for creative well-being?
We know that too much readily available internet porn reduces human desire. So it stands to reason we might want to consider that this use of AI may have consequences for us we don’t intend.
Could we create a great tipping point where a society, devoid of the means for cultivating its great creative class warriors, cease to provide the know-how to create more ‘tech’ to feed the AI revolution. How Ironic.
Revolution? Or de-volution. It’s for us to decide.
Episode 165 Are We Here Yet?
Plus Orrin Evans Part II in The Jazz Room ‘If you have an idea for something you think would make the world a better place, don’t wait for someone else to do it. Just don’t. Just get started.’ CEO Kimmerly Nace is dedicated to changing the narrative on how we see...
Episode 164 Are We Here Yet?
Plus Part I Orrin Evans in The Jazz Room Startup founders: today’s audio plat savoureux from the Innova802 crew focused on our guest Matt Cropp, executive director of the Vermont Employee Ownership Center (VEOC). We discussed why you need to consider your future exit...
Episode 163 Are We Here Yet?
Plus Composer Maria Schneider in The Jazz Room “We have to keep innovating for the future because it’s not happening right now’. We examine local real estate markets and the unique mix of property and economic development components at the local level here at the...
Episode 162 Are We Here Yet?
Without getting to Jargon-ey, our guest Gregory Thomas and yours truly explored where and how we in the private sector and within institutions can support the journey from on-the-shelf research to marketplace success. Gregory is The Executive Director and Lecturer...
Also from M the Media Project
Article Series
Podcasts
Video Channels
News Features
Mental Suppository Podcast
On the Rocks Politica
SMG’s ‘Are We Here Yet’?
Interested in advertising with us? Perhaps you want a unique way to support the economic development work we accomplish while getting access to our intelligent and informed listeners? Join our roster of supporters. Click that button below to find out more.
Get In Touch
Phone: 978-884-6596
© 2021 SM Graves Associates • Website Designed and Developed by inConcert Web Solutions • Site Map