You’ve seen the best, now here’s the West.
SMG's 'Are We Here Yet?' Podcast
Find our complete roster of podcasts
Essays From An Artist
I recently engaged in conversation with two local neighbors, a long-standing local business owner and a former elected official who offered their opinions on my support for a ‘return’ to investments in transforming our city’s core into a walkable, bike-able, densely populated urban center.
Scotts on the Rocks Politica Podcast
XXVI March 6, 2021
The City Council voted 10-1 to appropriate $225,500 for the City to demolish the falling-down factory building at 177 West St.
For those of you who actually want to see a building coming up from the ground by way of City Planning, you’ll have to wait a little longer.
To refresh your memory, here are some recent down to the ground City Planning (and costs), this list is a public record from the City’s Development and Planning (big “P”) Dept.:
20 Rock Street $318,000.00
Maki Block $517,400.00
32 Parker (Theatre) $649,660.00
158 Rear Main St. $400,410.00
85 Winter Street $498,950.00
122 Main St $40,200.00
56 Nichols St $28,500.00
138 Pleasant St. $19,300.00
Nothing was re-built on any of these properties. As far as we know, there is no Plan (big “P”) for re-building on any of them.
Add to this 177 West Street – $225,500.
It’s owned by some heir of the deceased owner.
We are told by our Building Commissioner that the building is going to collapse at any moment. A structural roof beam, or joist, fell down from its fastening point in the roof – and became situated in such a way that it is pushing outward on one of the perimeter walls.
So, when the wall falls, it’s going to fall outward – onto a building right next to it. When that happens, the other wall will fall into the street (West St.) – because of the way that beam/joist is situated.
There were two choices for the City Councillor:
1. Vote to spend the Taxpayers’ money on having it demolished and taken away, or
2. Vote not to spend the Taxpayers’ money, and hope it doesn’t fall on a human when it collapses.
Number 1 is bad because we have to spend Taxpayer money. I voted number one.
Number 2 is bad because the building would remain a horribly dangerous situation for Firefighters, homeless persons, and for children – and would remain a horrendous eyesore, and embarrassment.
Only one Councillor chose the second option. To me, that is like playing Russian Roulette with someone else’s head. Russian Roulette is when people take turns putting one bullet in a revolver, and spin the cylinder. Then, one person puts the gun against his/her own head, and pulls the trigger – hoping the one bullet did not end up in the chamber being activated when the trigger is pulled. That’s fair – you risk your own head, not someone else’s.
Some say: “you should have made the owner pay for it.”
But, the owner is dead.
“So, go after the heir.”
We tried that route. In America, in order to obtain money from someone who does not want to voluntarily hand it over (or is not able to), you have to go through the court system to force it. The legal course is a lengthy process in good times. Time is not a luxury we had here. But, we can still explore the options of that route, as we go.
So, we have this heir who inherited this albatross from a dead relative. The heir, who doesn’t live here, took some heat from City Councillors for failing to immediately throw $225,500 at this Money Pit.
The thought that some heir would come swiftly riding in on a white horse, with a quarter of a million dollars in a leather satchel, like some altruistic modern-day Mr. Watkins II, was pure fairy tale.
So, the heir was made out to be a very bad person – because she did not do “the right thing.”
How dare she? Let’s be real. No one knows this person. Maybe she is the devil, or a conservative, or some other loathsome thing. I don’t know.
But, maybe she’s just, well, working class folk.
First of all, no one asks to be an heir. Maybe some crazy relative put her in his will: “To my brother’s niece in-law, I think her name is Chris or Pat, (or maybe it’s his nephew in-law Chris or Pat), I leave my dilapidated, condemned, falling-down, dangerous, money-pit factory building, and my 8-track tapes of Sonny & Cher and Three Dog Night.” Congratulations, heir!
She probably has no extra money to throw away – never mind a quarter of a million dollars!
Did someone honestly think there would be some unlucky heir who had stayed away from this dilapidated, abandoned, falling-down, vacant, deserted and condemned building for a decade or more – but was going to fly in and quickly and voluntarily pay a quarter of a million dollars to take it out of here? I mean, come on.
The City should have commenced the appropriate dangerous nuisance legal action regarding this travesty a decade ago – and that would have cost the Taxpayers nothing (because our two City lawyers are on salary). I have no idea why that did not happen – but, that’s not the heir’s fault.
This was the heir’s choice: “Let me see, if I sell my house and everything I own, I will have $225,500 to my name. I can then use it to demolish my relative’s dilapidated factory building in Gardner, Mass. and be homeless. I’ll remain homeless, but I can’t pitch a tent on 177 West St. because I’ll have to turn the cleaned-up lot over to the City of Gardner for the back taxes my relative didn’t pay. If the property is contaminated, I’ll not only be homeless – I’ll owe money. But, at least they won’t think I’m a bad person anymore.”
The reality is that this is a worthless building, and it’s going to collapse. In the circumstances, there is hardly a scenario you can come up with where the Taxpayer would not end up on the hook to take care of it. As usual.
Scott M. Graves: Democratic Capitalism Series
We Have More Below
Essays from an Artist: Dealing with 177 West st. Gardner: What is wrong with city planners?
Ep. 37 Your Town, Built Stronger
When Will Johnnie Bravo Sing Again? On Millenials, Boomers & bad community development
No Apology for Urban Anthropology
New Opportunities in the MASSACHUSETTS CLIMATE ECONOMY
Ep.8 Building a Town for an New Era
Is It the Past or Is It the Future?
Scotts on the Rocks Politica is a political-centric broadcast that aims to lead through example.
Scott M. Graves is your host joined by a wide variety of guests from throughout the political spectrum and from a wide variety of disciplines.
Our intent is to provide rational and detailed discussion for listeners. We’re proving we have more in common and that we’re better together than torn asunder.
Our weekly podcast features careful examinations blendded with current events reporting from a national and local perspective.
If you appreciate local journalism with a global reach, if you want to cut through the BS and get right to the heart of the matter where it counts for your family our show was made for you.
With that in mind we’re launching an initiative we’re calling M The Media Project. This is a service of SMGraves Associates and over the months and years ahead we’re hoping to experiment with a variety of mediums, financial models and service delivery methods to deliver important news to a regional audience.
It is our hope that we will create successful media services companies, incubated right here in central Massachusetts that have the potential of becoming replicable.
Interested in advertising with us? Perhaps you want a unique way to support the economic development work we accomplish while getting access to our intelligent and informed listeners? Join our roster of supporters. Click that button below to find out more.