Passing the Smell Test

SMG's 'Are We Here Yet?' Podcast
Find our complete roster of podcasts
Essays From An Artist
I recently engaged in conversation with two local neighbors, a long-standing local business owner and a former elected official who offered their opinions on my support for a ‘return’ to investments in transforming our city’s core into a walkable, bike-able, densely populated urban center.  
Scotts on the Rocks Politica Podcast
Find our complete roster of podcasts Official Logo of the Scotts on the Rock Politica Podcast. Red white and blue lettering on a background of a bourbon on the rocks. The extreme background a US flag.

XXX March 22, 2021

Gardner plans on pretty much doubling the size of the City’s Sludge Dump located at West. St./Rt. 68 – in the Wildwood Cemetery Forest and the Cummings Otter River Conservation Area.

This is located at and within the fragile and invaluable ecosystems and watersheds existing there – which are part of the Otter River, Millers River and Connecticut River watercourses/systems.

The location has never made environmental sense – but it came about in 1919.  

In 2016 the expansion of this Sludge Dump was presented to the City Council as the only affordable option that the City had relative to a Sludge Dump that was nearing its “no vacancy” point.  

At that time, the City Council was presented with no information that the expansion might adversely affect the ecosystems and riversystems there.

Apart from the fact that cost estimates and the feasibility of options totally lose their confidence-reliance factor, and potency, when over four years have gone by, is expanding the existing Sludge Dump at that fragile ecosystem area in Gardner the right thing to do in 2021 and beyond?

If we didn’t care about the environment, the answer would be “yes.”

In 2016 the prior Executive Administration combined two infrastructure projects together: project one was the upgrades to the Wastewater Treatment Plant (“WWTP”); project two was the Sludge Dump Expansion.

At that time, we all knew that the WWTP needed upgrades, and the DEP was on it.  We had to act.  The WWTP upgrade was a foregone conclusion, and there was simply no debate about that – and it had to happen.  It’s like staring at your banana peel tires, and seeing your own face staring back at you.  You either don’t drive that car, or you get new tires.

But, the prior Executive Administration tied the necessary WWTP upgrades (project one) to the construction of an horizontally-expanded Sludge Dump (project 2).  

However, they were not dependent.

The necessary WWTP upgrades included the replacement of the Belt Filter Press (the “de-watering equipment”).  

This is because the Executive Administration advised the City Council that only two options were feasible: 1) expanding the Sludge Dump, or 2) hauling dried Sewer Sludge out of town (wet Sludge, i.e., if we didn’t add the centrifuges to the upgrades, was cost-prohibitive – and was not a viable option).  

Both options required that Belt Filter Press be replaced with centrifuges.

Therefore, it’s a reality that the WWTP upgrades were going to happen in 2016 with centrifuges – even if the Sludge Dump was not going to be expanded.

That is, the City Council could have approved the said WWTP upgrades, while voting “no” to the expansion the Sludge Dump. 

But that is not how the Executive Administration framed things.  Instead, it tied the expansion of the Sludge Dump to the necessary WWTP upgrades as co-dependent matters – even putting them into the same City Council vote (one City Council agenda item).

For example, the Executive Administration advised the City Council that “[t]he decision to move forward with the design and construction of the (upgraded de-watering equipment) would ultimately mean the (horizontal) expansion of the Sludge Landfill located off West Street” (the parentheticals are added for clarity, but the bold type is original, I did not add it – and it was the only bold type in a fairly long advisory letter).

Based upon the representations that the two projects were of equal urgency, and were co-dependent, the City Council voted for the necessary upgrades to the WWTP (project one) and, at the same time, voted to endorse the Executive Department’s idea to pursue the possibility of constructing an expanded Sludge Dump (project two) [the City Council ended up dividing the two votes; the first was 11-0, the second was 10-1].

So, why did the prior Executive Administration conjoin the two matters?

First of all, the expansion of the Sludge Dump was never a popular idea – and no one wanted to do it.  It did not past the smell-test.

But, the Executive Administration saw the expansion of the Sludge Dump as the only feasible option (it wasn’t) for future Sewer Sludge in Gardner.

By tying the expansion of the Sludge Dump (project two) as an automatic consequence of what was going to be a unanimous City Council approval of the necessary WWTP upgrades (project one), then the Executive Administration would be able to keep both the baby and the bath water – and, just like that, the smelly idea gets through on coattails.  

It’s like putting the 350-pound Refrigerator Perry on a full head of steam with Walter Payton holding onto the back of his jersey for a 1-yard TD walk-in.

Still, the City Council vote was a valid vote.  

The City Council voted to “endorse” the prior Executive Department’s idea to “pursue” the prospects of constructing an expansion of the Sludge Dump.  Those are the exact words of the vote. 

As far as City Council action goes, that’s about as milquetoast and non-committal as you can get.

The City Council did not vote to actually construct an expanded Sludge Dump.

The City Council has never appropriated one penny for the actual construction of the expanded Sludge Dump.  

Since 2016, not one shovel has touched the ground on the actual construction of the expansion of the Sludge Dump.  

Since 2016, the City Council has appropriated about 8% of the $5 million it will cost to have an operating, expanded Sludge Dump.  These appropriations were for some engineering, permitting and design – not for any actual construction.  The last appropriation was well over a year ago.

Over four years have passed since the City Council’s original “endorsement” of the Executive Department’s “pursuit” of a very expensive idea. 

Will a future City Council act favorably toward that 2016 “endorsement”? Will the notion of constructing an environmentally unfriendly (jeopardizing?) Sludge Dump expansion proximate to, and within, fragile ecosystems and rare geological formations, at the cost of $5 million of the Citizenry’s money, prompt a City Council to re-think it – before it’s too late?

We Have More Below

Discover conservation, economic development and local politics content from M the Media Project

Essays from an Artist: Dealing with 177 West st. Gardner: What is wrong with city planners?

Ep. 18 Sludge-tastica: Flowing Downhill

by Scotts on the Rocks Politica | How a Sludge Landfill takes down city hall

THE SLUDGE-TASTIC CITY OF GARDNER!

by Gardner Iron | Gardner (MA) has a Sludge Problem

The Miraculous Blue Necklace

by Scott J. Graves | Gardner Iron

Those Darned Vernal Pools

by Scott J. Graves | Gardner Iron

On Building Bridges

by SMG's 'Are We Here Yet?' | Cleantech Leader Mitch Tyson

New Opportunities in the MASSACHUSETTS CLIMATE ECONOMY

by Essays From An Artist | SMG & M the Media Project founder Scott M. Graves

On Millenials, Boomers & bad community development

by Essays From An Artist | SMG & M the Media Project founder Scott M. Graves

Scotts on the Rocks Politica is a political-centric broadcast that aims to lead through example.

Scott M. Graves is your host joined by a wide variety of guests from throughout the political spectrum and from a wide variety of disciplines.

Our intent is to provide rational and detailed discussion for listeners.  We’re proving we have more in common and that we’re better together than torn asunder.

Our weekly podcast features careful examinations  blendded with current events reporting from a national and local perspective.

If you appreciate local journalism with a global reach, if you want to cut through the BS and get right to the heart of the matter where it counts for your family our show was made for you.

 

With that in mind we’re launching an initiative we’re calling M The Media Project. This is a service of SMGraves Associates and over the months and years ahead we’re hoping to experiment with a variety of mediums, financial models and service delivery methods to deliver important news to a regional audience. 

It is our hope that we will create successful media services companies, incubated right here in central Massachusetts that have the potential of becoming replicable. 

The stakes for our society are too high for us not to take this endeavor on.  There are too many capable journalists across the country willing to take part in new and successful business enterprise dedicated to the smart delivery of local political, social and cultural stories.  The stories that tell us who we are and who we desire to be.
Official Logo of the Scotts on the Rock Politica Podcast. Red white and blue lettering on a background of a bourbon on the rocks. The extreme background a US flag.
Underwriting Scotts on the Rocks Politica Podcast.

Interested in advertising with us?  Perhaps you want a unique way to support the economic development work we accomplish while getting access to our intelligent and informed listeners?  Join our roster of supporters.  Click that button below to find out more.